RM 99,000. A great example of this fully optioned Ford Ranger Wildtrak. One owner since new, always serviced by Ford. Never bumped, crashed or flooded, nothing ever put in rear tray, this vehicle is in outstanding condition for 2018. New tires just fitted on the front. Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi DoubleCab 4x4 WildTrak A6. id: 21416500 Pick up 22.09.2022 14:55:14. Zdieľať inzerát. Zaparkovať. Svetelný senzor. Zobraziť všetky fotky ( 14) Za posledných 24 hodín si toto auto pozrelo 37 záujemcov. Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2 Tdci-147 kW-200 zs, Automāts, 4x4 Aprīkojums: - 4x4 pilnpiedziņa - Automātiskās dienas gaismas - Miglas lukturu funkcija - Navigācija - Ādas salons - Elektriski apsildāmi sēdekļi - Multistūre - Divu zonu klimata kontrole - Kruīza kontrole - Parkošanās sensori aizmugurē ar attēlu ekrānā - Atpakaļskata kamera - Piekabes āķis FORD RANGER WILDTRAK. Photo of 2018 Ford Ranger. PRICE $63,890 plus on-roads (expensive) WARRANTY/SERVICE 5 years/unlimited km; $1385 for 3 years (reasonable) Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4x4 AT - 2015. 565 Triệu. Đồng Nai. Mã: 4603955. *Xe nhập khẩu, màu trắng, máy dầu 3.2 L, số tự động Ford ranger 2 cầu, máy 3.2 AT, sản xuất 2015, màu trắng, máy dầu - Trang bị Hệ thống cài cầu điện tử không cần dừng với 3 chế độ gài cầu: 4H - 4L OOXF3tP. The 2022 Ford Ranger WILDTRAK 4x4 is a four-wheel drive double cab pickup that was released to the Australian market on 01/06/2021 classified as a PX MKIII The Ranger is regarded as a pick up or cab chassis 4x4 built in Thailand with prices from a dealer as a used car starting at $67, Ranger is a four-wheel drive 4 door with 5 seats, powered by a DIESEL TURBO 5 engine that has 147 kW of power at 3000 rpm and 470 Nm of torque at 1500 rpm via a Six-speed Automatic. Ford claims the Ranger WILDTRAK 4x4 uses of Diesel in the combined city and highway cycle while putting out 234g of CO2. It has a 80L fuel tank, meaning it should be able to travel 899km per full Ranger measures 1848mm inches in height, 5389mm inches in length, 1850mm inches in width with a 3220mm inches wheelbase that brings about a total of 2278kg lbs of unladen weight. The Ranger WILDTRAK 4x4 comes standard with 265/60 R18 front tyres and 265/60 R18 rear tyres. It requires a service every 12 months or 15,000 km, whichever comes first. It has a 60 month, unlimited kilometre 2022 Ford Ranger WILDTRAK 4x4 has a 232mm ground clearance with a 3500kg braked and 750kg unbraked towing capacity. It has a final gear ratio of Ranger has received a 5 star rating from ANCAP. The VIN number can be found on the Centre Of Chassis Frame and the compliance plate is located on the Lower Driver Side B-Pillar. An example VIN number would be similar to M*MF$%0&W123456. Buy CarNew Car SearchUsed CarsCommercial VehiclesNew Cars Buyer's GuideNew Cars SpecsCompare New CarsCar AlertsCar SpecialsSell CarHomeUsed TDCiFilter searchGet alerted of new stock uploaded that match your search a car alertReceive email alerts when we add new cars matching your popular used carsDisplaying 1 - 20 of 571 resultsSelected optionsClear allCreate a car alertReceive email alerts when we add new cars matching your Ford Ranger TDCi Wildtrak Auto Double-CabR 389 000BMW CenturionCenturion, GautengShow km away from you172018 Ford Ranger TDCi Wildtrak Double-CabR 459 950Klerksdorp, North West ProvinceShow km away from you92017 Ford Ranger TDCi XLT Double-CabR 359 900George, Western CapeShow km away from you72019 Ford Ranger TDCi Wildtrak 4x4 Auto Double-CabR 479 900Tzaneen, LimpopoShow km away from you132018 Ford Ranger TDCi XLT Auto Double-CabR 389 900Randburg, GautengShow km away from you142018 Ford Ranger TDCi Wildtrak Auto Double-CabR 359 900Pretoria, GautengShow km away from you302021 Ford Ranger TDCi XLT 4x4 Auto SuperCabR 599 495Malmesbury, Western CapeShow km away from you02021 Ford Ranger TDCi XLT 4x4 Auto SuperCabR 539 900Midrand, GautengShow km away from you172017 Ford Ranger TDCi Wildtrak 4x4 Auto Double-CabR 389 900Ermelo, MpumalangaShow km away from you192019 Ford Ranger TDCi Wildtrak Auto Double-CabR 699 900Team CITPretoria, GautengShow km away from you182016 Ford Ranger TDCi Wildtrak 4x4 Auto Double-CabR 429 900Team CITPretoria, GautengShow km away from you172018 Ford Ranger TDCi Wildtrak Auto Double-CabR 479 900Team CITPretoria, GautengShow km away from you182017 Ford Ranger TDCi Wildtrak Auto Double-CabR 419 900Team CITPretoria, GautengShow km away from you172018 Ford Ranger TDCi Wildtrak 4x4 Auto Double-CabR 499 900Team CITPretoria, GautengShow km away from you162014 Ford Ranger TDCi Wildtrak Auto Double-CabR 299 900Team CITPretoria, GautengShow km away from you262016 Ford Ranger TDCi XLT Auto Double-CabR 289 900Klerksdorp, North West ProvinceShow km away from you162014 Ford Ranger TDCi XLT 4x4 Auto Double-CabR 269 900WeBuyCars Silver LakesPretoria, GautengShow km away from you202013 Ford Ranger TDCi XLS 4x4 SuperCabR 186 900WeBuyCars RichmondCape Town, Western CapeShow km away from you62018 Ford Ranger TDCi XLT Auto Double-CabR 375 900Bloemfontein, Free StateShow km away from you142018 Ford Ranger TDCi XLT Double-CabR 369 890MMA DealershipPinetown, Kwazulu NatalShow km away from youPrevious12345678...29NextGet alerted of new stock uploaded that match your search a car alertReceive email alerts when we add new cars matching your my searchFord RangerThe Ford Ranger has been a top-seller since the launch of the T6-generation model in 2011. The Ranger was the first bakkie to offer many car-like comfort features and safety tech and the range-topping Wildrak version effectively established the leisure bakkie segment. The entire Ranger line-up is built in Pretoria, including the Raptor bakkie – a specialist hardcore 4x4 vehicle with bespoke suspension for off-roading. Related Ford Ranger News The 2013 Ford Ranger WILDTRAK 4x4 is a four-wheel drive crew cab utility that was released to the Australian market on 01/09/2011 classified as a PX. The Ranger is regarded as a pick up or cab chassis 4x4 built in Thailand with prices from a dealer as a used car starting at $32, Ranger is a four-wheel drive 4 door with 5 seats, powered by a DIESEL TURBO 5 engine that has 147 kW of power at 3000 rpm and 470 Nm of torque at 1500 rpm via a Six-speed Manual. Ford claims the Ranger WILDTRAK 4x4 uses of Diesel in the combined city and highway cycle while putting out 248g of CO2. It has a 80L fuel tank, meaning it should be able to travel 851km per full Ranger measures 1848mm inches in height, 5389mm inches in length, 1850mm inches in width with a 3220mm inches wheelbase that brings about a total of 2200kg lbs of unladen weight. The Ranger WILDTRAK 4x4 comes standard with 265/60 R18 front tyres and 265/60 R18 rear tyres. It requires a service every 12 months or 15,000 km, whichever comes first. It has a 36 month, 100km 2013 Ford Ranger WILDTRAK 4x4 has a 232mm ground clearance with a 3500kg braked and 750kg unbraked towing capacity. It has a final gear ratio of Ranger has received a 5 star rating from ANCAP. The VIN number can be found on the Centre Of Chassis Frame and the compliance plate is located on the Lower Driver Side B-Pillar. An example VIN number would be similar to 6PFMBGE0P123456. Buyers of four-wheel drives and utes love to parley the contents of each other's engine bay. But which is of these Ranger powerplants is best? No replacement for displacement. Aside from the Summernats burnout pad, no motoring subculture seems so wedded to the idea of 'bigger equals better' than four-wheel drivers. And once upon a time, they were well served by big, mechanical lumps of iron that lacked outright power and refinement, but packed plenty of low-down torque and days, displacement is being replaced by technology. Multiple turbochargers, advanced fuel injection and efficient engine designs mean you can get more power, torque and efficiency from a smaller power plant. Plus, emissions are much better, which is a good Ford is offering three engine choices for its well-regarded 2020 Ranger ute. There's an entry-level four-cylinder turbo diesel that's the first choice among fleet operators and powers lower grades of the Ranger, but we're going to side-step that one for across most of the range is the five-cylinder turbo diesel engine, which has been in service since the T6 platform lobbed back in for the flagship Ranger Raptor, and optional on high-grade models like the Wildtrak and XLT, is Ford's newer four-cylinder turbo diesel engine. This choice brings more power and torque, along with a 10-speed automatic gearbox, for a $1500 one turbocharger across five cylinders, the engine makes 147kW at 3000rpm and 470Nm at 1750–2500rpm. Solid numbers, which have stood the test of time reasonably less capacity, and a lower cylinder count, but an extra turbo and a boatload more technology, Ford’s new EcoBlue’ or BiTurbo’ diesel engine develops 157kW at 3750rpm and 500Nm at 1750– are a few extra specification differences between these two that are worth pointing out. The black Ranger is another addition to Ford's burgeoning range called Wildtrak X. Costing $2000 extra, the package adds in unique black 18-inch alloy wheels with 20mm of additional negative offset now +35mm. There are also fender flares, a snorkel, nudge bar and light while the automatic Ranger Wildtrak X costs $66,290 before on-roads with its extras, the Ranger Wildtrak goes for $65,790 before more power, more torque, more gear ratios, what’s not to like about the smaller engine? While the engine still has its fan base, and has developed a mostly good reputation over the years, take-up of the seems successful amongst new Ranger order to improve its power and torque density, the newer engine has plenty of additional tech tricks up its sleeve. Along with two variable-geometry turbochargers, the engine has an integrated intake manifold, and camshaft timing is handled by a low-friction belt-in-oil design. Instead of a timing chain or belt on the front of the engine, a special glass cord belt, designed to last the life of the engine, turns inside partially submerged in sump While both engines provide adequate propulsion for a 4x4 ute, the more powerful engine unsurprisingly gives better overall performance. The engine is initially slightly more willing off the line, but the smaller donk is more flexible and responsive once rolling. It uses noticeably more of the tachometer also, rising and falling as the gearbox shuffles through all those a great deal todayInterested in one of these cars? Complete your details and we'll connect you to our gearboxes are smooth and well mannered, but the 10-speed is naturally much busier with so many choices. It's worth noting here, the smaller engine has a slightly narrower peak torque band, which the gearbox does a good job of chasing. Interestingly, both gearboxes give off an odd, random thud from time to engine makes more noise, with a somewhat unique thrum coming from its five cylinders. You can see this as being a bit raw and uncouth, or just adding a bit of character. Kind of like that uncle at Christmas after too many drinks. The bigger engine doesn’t rev as much, with a lower redline and noticeably less willingness to certain, however, is that the engine makes less noise in operation. Only when working hard does it start to make some noise – most of the time it's impressively quiet. A lot of this noise reduction comes from the advanced overall design, and things like internal timing belts. The engine, like most others, uses a timing chain mounted on the front of the engine. With only a thin pressed metal case over the top, it isn’t so well insulated from making noise. Engine BiTurbo Duratorq Engine size cc 1996 3198 turbochargers 2 1 Power 157kw 3750rpm 147kW 3000rpm Torque 500Nm 1750-2000rpm 470Nm 1750-2500rpm 1st gear ratio low range ratio final drive ratio crawl ratio claimed efficiency fuel tank size 80 litres 80 litres Engine Technology Both engines have a cast-iron block and aluminium cylinder heads, and both use diesel particulate filters and exhaust gas recirculation EGR systems to keep emissions in check. Neither uses an AdBlue-type urea injection through the exhaust, although the related Everest SUV also use piezoelectric fuel injectors, but the newer engine can fire up to six injections per combustion cycle, compared to only five for the Duratorq. It also shoots a finer mist of fuel, injecting as little as a grain of sugar each time, through eight holes that are no wider than a human hair. This helps with power, but also means the smaller engine will likely be more finicky with the cleanliness and quality of it's interesting point is that the engine also has a crankshaft that is offset to the side by 10mm. This reduces side loads on the pistons as they travel up and down in the cylinder, which in turn reduces friction efficiency All of these engineering tricks for better efficiency yield better efficiency overall; however, it’s not a huge difference. Ford quotes litres per 100km on the combined cycle for the BiTurbo compared to for the didn’t meet either of these claims in our testing. Both sat around the mark for general town and highway usage, but the smaller engine netted better economy in sustained highway usage. We reckon it’s probably more from the extra gearbox ratios, rather than the smaller While time restraints stopped us COVID slows everything from towing with these two examples, we can draw upon previous experiences of towing to give you a good idea. Like what we found with our previous Everest comparison, having more power, torque and gear ratios makes for a better tow flies in the face of traditional thinking, I know. And many bearded men are likely guffawing into their schooners as they read this, but it's inescapable. Although the engine has a bit more chubbiness in the peak torque curve, 30 extra newton-metres and ten more kilowatts don't go unnoticed. And with much narrower ratio spreads between each gear ratio, it's a done deal. Weights BiTurbo DuraTorq Kerb weight 2246kg 2278kg GVM 3200kg 3200kg payload 954kg 922kg GCM 6000kg 6000kg towing capacity 3500kg 3500kg Gearing With different gearing through the transmission and differentials, both Rangers have an almost exact first gear ratio in high and low range. Top gear is effectively taller for the 10-speed, helping keep revs and fuel consumption down. And, of course, there are much shorter jumps between each gear when you’ve got four extra up your you want to get into the finer details, 32kg worth of kerb weight 2246kg for the BiTurbo, 2278kg for the yields a commensurate bump in payload 954kg v 922kg respectively, with both utes sharing a 3200kg GVM, 3500kg braked towing capacity and 6000kg gross combined Servicing costs sit very close between the two, with only slight variations on some visits. While the Ranger costs $2616 after seven years or 105,000km, the costs $2631 for the same period of time. Both have service intervals every 15,000km or 12 months, whichever comes are also covered by the same five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty. Wondering which of the two will be more reliable over the years is similar to asking how long that piece of string is. It depends on a lot of variables, although the older unit does have a bit more real-world can gather some additional insights from looking at recall information. Service costs Kilometres BiTurbo DuraTorq 15,000 $299 $299 30,000 $299 $299 45,000 $299 $299 60,000 $299 $299 75,000 $365 $395 90,000 $690 $645 105,000 $365 $395 Total $2616 $2631 VERDICT Both engines are sound choices in a ute that has otherwise shirked its years impressively well. For many, choosing will be based on personal preference. Some take solace in an older design with more capacity at the ready, and that same buyer might enjoy the extra noise that comes with the same people will prefer the relative simplicity of a single turbocharger and more accessible front timing chain. And although there is one less piezoelectric fuel injector to worry about, it’s not as advanced a design as the other engine. I also like to see the higher-mounted alternator for a newer, smaller and more expensive option delivers more of those things we like to see power, torque, performance refinement and efficiency. And for those reasons of such core importance for a driveline, it's my pick of the wait! We're not finished just yet. They say that variety is the spice of life, and two heads are often better than one. With that in mind, we've conjured up the opinion of Joshua Dowling on this subject, who has spent more seat time in 4X4 utes than many would care to admit. Take it away...Co-tester points Joshua Dowling Back when the borders were open – at the start of the coronavirus crisis – I drove from Sydney to Melbourne to avoid air thought of sitting in a metal tube for an hour or so with or without a mask didn’t appeal to me. I was a germaphobe even before COVID-19, and was socially distant long before it became a I love driving, even if it is the monotonous Hume Highway. I used to do that run on a monthly basis back in the a much easier drive now; there’s not a single set of lights from the freeway in the heart of Sydney to the outskirts of Melbourne’s CBD. The only reasons to stop now are for food and fuel – and in our case, mission drive a Ford Ranger Wildtrak from Sydney to Melbourne and bring back a twin-turbo suited me I can’t get enough of driving the Ford Ranger. Although it’s not perfect, it has held up incredibly well despite its age and is still the benchmark in many areas, thanks to continual improvements over the the Ford Ranger is Australia’s second-best selling vehicle after the Toyota HiLux, so it was good to get reacquainted, especially as there was a bunch of new or updated utes around the corner, such as the Isuzu D-Max and Mazda BT-50. And the facelifted Toyota of the most common questions we get asked when someone is looking to buy a Ford Ranger is which engine to choose. Even the team in the office is divided on the there is no debate. The is the way to go sorry boss.The five-cylinder sounds the business, but it is heavier, thirstier and less powerful than the new-generation twin-turbo stark contrast was evident to me during last year’s ute mega test. The Ford Ranger – backed by a 10-speed auto – was faster and more fuel efficient than the backed by a 6-speed auto in the Mazda BT-50 which at the time was a Ford Ranger in a Mazda body.We did 0 to 100kmh tests empty, with a 650kg load in the tray, and when towing a 2200kg caravan. In every instance, the Ford Ranger aced the save you searching the internet, the 0-100km/h times when the vehicles weren’t carrying a load or towing were as follows Ford Ranger seconds, Mazda BT-50 seconds.With 650kg in the tray, the 0-100km/h times were seconds seconds and when towing a 2200kg caravan the 0-100km/h times were seconds and seconds build some suspense into the Sydney-Melbourne return trip, I tried to drive each way on one needed a fuel stop because I had done some suburban driving before setting off. But the made it one way with ease. And when I refuelled it, the distance-to-empty read the end, the returned litres per 100km of diesel whereas the returned 10L/100km after resetting the trip at the start of the freeway, to compare like-for-like.So unless you love the noise of the and that’s a valid reason in my book, or are concerned about the longevity of a small engine doing a lot of heavy lifting over, say, 10 years, the is better. At least on The shift in the 10-speed auto is not as smooth as the six-speed auto, as it can jolt unexpectedly between gears when it gets we had a fuel-injector failure on the some time after we did this run. It was one of the newer, updated injectors for this model an earlier stop sale’ notice was issued to replace a bad batch of injectors, but it seems we got one of the bad ones. There was no additional damage the faulty injector was replaced, and the Ranger was back on the road after a quick visit to the service with that hiccup, I would still prefer to live with the over the It feels lighter over the nose, is responsive and fuel efficient, and makes light work of the daily grind or when heading says the front shocks and springs are unique to each model, and in 2018 Ford changed the front anti-roll bar and lowered the recommended tyre pressures to soften the are extremely comfortable to live with day-to-day, and on the open road. But the would be my personal preference. Overall RatingsDrive’s Pick2021 Ford Ranger Wildtrak Pick-up Double 102020 Ford Ranger Wildtrak Pick-up Double 10Ratings BreakdownPerformance2021 Ford Ranger Wildtrak Pick-up Double Ford Ranger Wildtrak Pick-up Double Quality2021 Ford Ranger Wildtrak Pick-up Double Ford Ranger Wildtrak Pick-up Double & Dynamics2021 Ford Ranger Wildtrak Pick-up Double Ford Ranger Wildtrak Pick-up Double Technology2021 Ford Ranger Wildtrak Pick-up Double Ford Ranger Wildtrak Pick-up Double Comfort & Packaging2021 Ford Ranger Wildtrak Pick-up Double Ford Ranger Wildtrak Pick-up Double Technology2021 Ford Ranger Wildtrak Pick-up Double Ford Ranger Wildtrak Pick-up Double & Connectivity2021 Ford Ranger Wildtrak Pick-up Double Ford Ranger Wildtrak Pick-up Double Efficiency2021 Ford Ranger Wildtrak Pick-up Double Ford Ranger Wildtrak Pick-up Double for Money2021 Ford Ranger Wildtrak Pick-up Double Ford Ranger Wildtrak Pick-up Double for Purpose2021 Ford Ranger Wildtrak Pick-up Double Ford Ranger Wildtrak Pick-up Double Purcell has been writing about cars, four-wheel driving and camping since 2013, and obsessed with anything that goes brum-brum longer than he can remember. Sam joined the team at CarAdvice/Drive as the off-road Editor in 2018, after cutting his teeth at Unsealed 4X4 and Pat Callinan’s 4X4 more about Sam Purcell Ford Motor Company Limited uses cookies and similar technologies on this website to improve your online experience and to show tailored advertising to you. Manage Agree You can manage cookies at any time on the Manage Cookie Settings page but this may limit or prevent use of certain features on the website. Please see the website privacy and cookie policy for further information. Key Features To be populated as per Local Market Specifications Should be taken from NGC ... ... ... Use our useful links below to find out more information

ford ranger wildtrak 3.2